Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable

Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable

1) That the price of decay is constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances into the specimen dated haven’t been modified during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that whenever the stone first formed it included a known amount of child product (“Radioisotopes in addition to chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)

We should observe that past processes may never be occurring at all today, and that some could have happened at prices and intensities far not the same as comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)

Jesus cursed the bottom (the stones too!)

See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed may be the ground for the sake”

Whenever this occurred there is a burst of radioactity that made the stones look over the age of they certainly were.

Would not this make most of the rocks look the age that is same?

“The stone real question is quite simple and has now related to the fundamental elements which comprised these stones at the beginning. Whenever every one of these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it could simply be normal to allow them to act based on their properties that are individual fundamentally acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices. Let’s imagine at first every element that is radioactive “exploded” into presence from pre-existent elements. None of the early quicker half-lives is the just like they have been today.

As time progressed each would commence to get its slow modern-day half-life that is stable but would each of them get these stable prices in a uniformity which may have them all in synchrony? We question it. You are right if they did, all would give the same ages. Each may possibly get to balance at differing times.

Glance at biological breakdown everywhere, it proceeds at various prices. Go through the world from a devolutionary standpoint and observe excellence happens to be lost and breakdown has proceeded in spurts and stasis durations. Some of us have lost additional information than others, that is why some are at Harvard, but others, more regrettable, the exact same age have a problem with debilitating hereditary degenerative diseases like Lupus, MS, ALS, Crohn’s and several other diseases that are autoimmune. The secrets of that are locked within the “vault of degeneration knowledge” that evolutionists are unwilling to start for fear that individuals creationists may be proper.” Jack Cuozzo 3/02

Carbon dates they did in contrast to

Carbon relationship is often an embarrassment to experts. Here are some Carbon 14 dates that have been refused since they would not accept development

(then your web browser does not support tables – please email me for these dates if you do not see a chart below)

Residing seal

Antarctic seawater has a low amount of C14. Consequently organisms residing here dated by C14 give many years much over the age of their real age.

There are numerous more examples that we shall include later on. Nevertheless the people above provide you with a general concept.

There are some other ways of dating. They too, offer diverse outcomes.

Potassium-argon dating

The potassium-argon technique ended up being accustomed date volcanic product in this next instance.

Volcanic ash has additionally been recognized to offer dates much avove the age of they really had been .

Lava moves at Mt Ngauruhoe, brand new Zealand provided dates that are erroneousfrom K-Ar analyses) which range from

Gets the price of decay stayed constant?

The biggest issue with dating techniques may be the assumption that the rate of decay has remained constant. There’s absolutely no real solution to show it. In fact there was much proof to show this price have not remained constant, and that it really is decaying quicker and faster. Exactly what the bible, and a Devolution and model that is degenerating of planet would predict.

a laugh about Dinosaurs and dating

Some tourists when you look at the United states Museum of Natural History had been marveling during the dinosaur bones on display. One of these asked the guard, “Can I am told by you exactly how old the dinosaur bones are?”

The guard responded, “they have been 65 million, four years, and half a year old.”

“That’s an awfully precise quantity,” claims the tourist. “How do you understand their age so precisely?”

The guard replied, “Well, the dinosaur bones had been sixty five million years old whenever I began working here, and therefore ended up being four and a years that are half.”

Ahead this site to your friends and relations

If this website was enjoyed by you, make sure to tell your buddies about any of it.

When you yourself have any queries on production, Evolution, or want to say just “Hi” please do not hesitate click this over here now to e-mail me.

Carbon dating recommendations:

1) From a video Lecture by Dr. Kent Hovind

6)Antarctic Journal, Washington 10)”Dry bones as well as other fossils” by Dr. Gary Parker